RECYKAL TIMESIntelligence for the circular economyArchive search
Electronics brands face escalating recycling quotas while legal challenges against mandatory certificate price floors remain unresolved in court.
For years, the weak spot in e-waste EPR was the certificate nobody could trace. A CPCB direction dated 7 July 2026 closes that gap. On the E-Waste EPR Portal, a recycling certificate now stands only if a GST e-invoice backs the sale of the recovered metal. If it does not, CPCB calls it a false certificate. For a producer who buys certificates to meet an EPR target, this is the best protection handed to you in a long time.
India has one national EPR system for waste batteries, but it does not have one functioning certificate market. A 29 October 2026 snapshot of CPCB’s public dashboard shows a deep pool of lead credits and a remarkably small pool of lithium credits. For battery brands, the compliance question is no longer simply whether certificates exist, but whether the correct metal-specific certificate exists when it is needed.
The government fixed a floor price for e-waste recycling certificates, 30% of the environmental compensation for dodging the rule, which works out to ₹22 a kg for consumer electronics and ₹10 to ₹41 across other categories. That floor is what lets a registered recycler pay a real rate for your old TV or laptop instead of a race-to-the-bottom price. On 22 October 2026 the Environment Minister called for "coordination between producers and recyclers." In e-waste, that coordination is a court fight: Samsung, LG, Havells, Daikin and Voltas have asked the Delhi High Court to strike the floor down and let the market set the price. For the collector and the recycler, the whole economics of doing it the legal way rests on how that case ends.
Multi-layered plastic, the foil-lined sachets and pouches that hold shampoo, ketchup, gutka and milk powder, is about 21% of India's plastic waste by the government's own composition data, yet it is the one stream the scrap market barely touches. A collector earns almost nothing for it, because the layers cannot be cleanly separated and the money recovered hardly covers the cost of picking, moving and sorting it. A fresh survey shows the squeeze: Indians say they would pay more for sustainable packaging, the most willing of any country, but at the shop the cheapest sachet still wins. What is changing is not the scrap value. It is who pays, and the answer, increasingly, is the brand, through EPR.
India's latest waste-tyre import decision recommends 288,219 tonnes across 23 applications. But 91,479 tonnes, nearly one-third of the total, is linked to further EPR verification or CPCB checks. The message for importers, recyclers and tyre brands is clear: capacity may open the gate, but only a consistent trail from import to production, sale and certificate can keep it open.
Between 1 April and 30 September 2026, India's battery rules did not receive a new Gazette amendment. The operating standard still changed sharply. A GST e-invoice cutover and two detailed CPCB guidelines connected battery-scrap collection, storage, transport, recycling, recovered-material sales and EPR certificates more tightly than before.
Between 1 April and 30 September 2026, India did not rewrite the E-Waste (Management) Rules. It tightened the way compliance is demonstrated. GST-linked invoice controls, certificate cut-offs, return extensions and portal discipline made one point clear for electronics brands: an EPR certificate is credible only when the commercial and material records behind it can be reconciled.
India used 16.8 million tonnes of its main plastics in 2024-25 but made only 13.4 million tonnes, and the government's own trend projection has imports rising to about a third of demand by 2030-31. New plants could narrow that gap, but one is still ramping up and the other is years away. Meanwhile the recycled-content rule for rigid packaging climbs from 40% in 2026-27 to 60% by 2028-29, and imported plastic cannot meet it. For anyone who collects, sorts or reprocesses HDPE and PP, that is a long runway of demand.
Reliance and IVL Dhunseri raised virgin PET prices by ₹2 a kg from 24 September 2026, with Brent crude above $100 a barrel. It lands at the halfway mark of the first year in which rigid plastic packaging must carry 40% recycled content. In May 2026, recyclers said a fifth or more of their food-grade capacity was idle, while an industry body representing beverage makers says supply falls short. Dearer virgin resin weakens the cost case for waiting and gives more bargaining power to whoever holds clean PET bottles.
MoEFCC grants major relief to producers and recyclers, pushing the deadline for FY2025-26 returns to September 30, 2026, amid portal glitches.
A floor under e-waste EPR certificates changes recycler economics in ways that reward capacity commitments made before notification, not after.
Freight repricing moved the delivered cost ranking of scrap origins. A tightened ingot specification moved which of those origins you can actually use.
Documentation and traceability requirements are becoming the real barrier to entry in lithium-ion recovery, not processing technology.